By Brookson
There are an
estimated 2.5M workers within the UK flexible workforce. 1.7M of these are
freelancers (IPSE data) and 1.2M work through recruitment businesses. These
workers are providing their services to end client businesses but are not employed
by those businesses – they are typically engaged directly by recruitment
business, employed by an umbrella business or are self-employed, working
through their own limited
company or
on an unincorporated basis. The flexible workforce has been growing steadily
for many years, both prior to and through the recent recession. These workers
are an important part of the growth story that we are now seeing in the UK
economy, allowing businesses to commit resources to new projects or additional
business activity that they would not be prepared to do if they need to employ
permanent staff to do so. The flexible work force is a vital element for the UK
in order to gain a competitive advantage in its activity in global markets.
So, are these
vital workers being properly valued by the UK Government?
My high level
answer to this question would be that the flexible workforce is more valued by
our Government than it has been at any time previously, but there is still some
way to go before it is properly appreciated and supported.
There are three
elements that I have considered to come to my high level view – the understanding
of the flexible workforce by Government, the legislative decisions taken
recently impacting the flexible workforce and political moves made.
The flexible
workforce is undoubtedly more understood by more policy makers than it ever has
been. This greater understanding can be seen in many government and government
department comments and communications on self-employed and flexible workers.
There is much more differentiation between the various populations of workers
with their differing needs. The discussions that we have with politicians and
policy makers, both at a Brookson business level and through our FCSA industry
trade body, clearly show an improving understanding of and appreciation for
flexible workers. There is further progress needed on this but progress in
levels of understanding has been positive over recent years in my view.
Government and
policy makers have also demonstrated this greater understanding in the
decisions that have been taken in the legislative framework around the flexible
workforce. Some action has been taken by HMRC around the low paid end schemes
abusing national minimum wage, travel and subsistence expenses and salary
sacrifice schemes.
The offshore and onshoreintermediaries
legislation was very precisely focussed on false self employment schemes in
particular sectors and which were prevalent at the low paid end of the flexible
workforce, even though the reporting requirements element to this legislation
is not quite so well targeted. IR35 has been left alone despite a number of
reviews by the Government through OTS and the House of Lords Select Committee –
this was the right answer in my view. It lets the genuinely self employed
workers at the high paid end of flexible workforce retain the stability they
have had for many years. I recognise that IR35 is flawed in a number of ways
but it is manageable and known and these are valuable things as the economy
starts to pick up. The IR35 Forum continue to work at improving the
administration of this area of enforcement and the recent decision to withdraw
the Business Entity Test’s previously issued is, again in my view, another
positive step. The use of limited companies by contractors has also been reviewed and validated –
again, a good outcome helped by the improving understanding of the relevant
policy makers. There are a number of examples of sensible decision making in
the legislative environment over the last few years.
Additionally, we
have seen some positive actions in political as well as legislative terms. The
recent appointment of David Morris MP as the Government’s self-employed ambassador is a significant step
forward. A large population of the flexible workforce are self-employed
contractors and freelancers and having a Government post
specifically focussed on understanding all elements of the UK’s 4.6M
self-employed individuals, including the contractor and freelancer elements
feels like a substantial commitment from this Government. Obviously, we will
wait to see what agenda is then driven by Mr Morris and the Government under
this new appointment but I would see the appointment at this stage as extremely
encouraging.
If I step back
and look across the various activities of the Government, Government
departments and other related policy makers or regulators/enforcement
organisations, I am encouraged by what I have seen over recent years. More of
these individuals appear to be getting more of an understanding of the flexible
workforce and, in doing so, are seemingly recognising more of the value that
this section of the UK workforce brings for the UK economy.
That said, there
is still a long way to go. There is still undoubtedly a lot of abuse and
exploitation at the low paid end of the flexible workforce that hasn’t yet been
tackled by the Government. Low paid, low skilled often vulnerable workers are
still being forced unknowingly into ‘industrial’ tax avoidance schemes for the
benefit of end clients, recruitment businesses and umbrella business providers.
These large scale abuses need to be tackled more rigorously. In doing this,
there is a real and urgent need for the Government to properly understand the
umbrella market. Compliant employment businesses are a vital part of the
flexible workforce supply chain, providing significant benefits and protections
to flexible workers who chose to work this way. Equally, there are instances
where workers are being exploited. The key here is for politicians and policy
makers to spend enough time understanding the abuses and stop these from
happening rather than seeing all umbrella businesses as rogues. We see an
example of this in the latest union campaign around umbrella working in the
construction sector. This generated a day of action around the UK. Undoubtedly,
the abuse of national minimum wage in all of its forms must be stopped – HMRC
have the enforcement powers necessary to do this and I would hope that they
would get on and sort these abuses out. The key point here is that the umbrella
way of working is not the problem here – it is abuse of the existing
legislation. This needs enforcement of current laws not a stopping of umbrella
working completely.
In summary, I
think this Government is increasingly recognising the contribution of the
flexible work force and the environment we currently have is as good as it has
been for many years. There is still further progress to be made and this should
be concentrated on further education of politicians and policy makers on
flexible workforce to ensure they continue to make sensible policy decisions
and enforcement of existing legislation to ensure the known non-compliance
problems in the flexible workforce are actioned, particularly at the low paid,
potentially vulnerable worker end of the workforce.
Let’s see what
2015 brings!
No comments:
Post a Comment